{"id":1136,"date":"2023-12-02T14:01:48","date_gmt":"2023-12-02T06:01:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/jcecc\/effectiveness-and-impact\/phase-ii-project-2019-2021\/icest\/"},"modified":"2026-02-25T09:59:47","modified_gmt":"2026-02-25T01:59:47","slug":"evaluation-on-the-integrated-community-end-of-life-care-support-teams-icests","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/foss.hku.hk\/jcecc\/en\/effectiveness-and-impact\/phase-ii-project-2019-2021\/evaluation-on-the-integrated-community-end-of-life-care-support-teams-icests\/","title":{"rendered":"Evaluation on the Integrated community End-of-Life Care Support Teams (ICESTs)"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row bwd_tbc4vd_show_weekday=”” el_class=”d-flex justify-content-center mb-4 wow fadeInUp animated”][vc_column]

<\/div>

Evaluation on the Integrated community End-of-Life Care Support Teams (ICESTs) <\/i><\/h2><\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row bwd_tbc4vd_show_weekday=”” el_class=”boxshadow mb-5 wow fadeInUp animated”][vc_column]
<\/div>

Beneficiaries<\/h3><\/div>
\n

The EoLC programmes delivered by four NGOs had benefited altogether 1 410 patients and their family caregivers between 2019 and 2021. These patients comprised of 51.6% cancer patients, 18.9% with renal disease, 6.1% with lung disease, and the remaining consists of patients with various non-cancer conditions.\n

 \n

<\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row bwd_tbc4vd_show_weekday=”” el_class=”boxshadow mb-5 wow fadeInUp animated”][vc_column]

<\/div>

Methodology<\/h3><\/div>
\n

For the methodology of evaluating the outcomes and impacts of the community-based EoLC programmes, please refer to Phase I methodology: http:\/\/foss.hku.hk\/jcecc\/zh\/%E7%A4%BE%E5%8D%80%E5%AE%89%E5%AF%A7%E7%85%A7%E9%A1%A7%E8%A8%88%E5%8A%83%E8%A9%95%E4%BC%B0\/<\/a>\n

In addition, different from the quantitative evaluation with \u201ccommunity partners\u201d in Phase I, the University of Hong Kong conducted individual in-depth interviews with patients and family caregivers who received services between 2019 to 2021. This qualitative study aims at exploring the satisfaction levels and view of service recipients regarding the service implementation and overall effectiveness of JCECC EoLC services. A total of 7 patients and 10 caregivers were interviewed.\n

 \n

<\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row bwd_tbc4vd_show_weekday=”” el_class=”boxshadow mb-5 wow fadeInUp animated”][vc_column]

<\/div>

Achievements<\/h3><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Significant Improvements on Quality of Life in Patient<\/h4><\/div>
\n

A total of 406 patients completed the assessments at service intake and 3 months after services (figure 1). Assessed patients reported 26.8% reduction of physical symptoms, 38.3% reduction of depressive symptoms, and 35.1% reduction of anxiety. Additionally, their information needs and practical problems greatly reduced by 42.8% and 49.5% respectively. Meanwhile, patients also reported 33.4% reduction in spiritual distresses, 29.8% reduction in family conflicts and 27.2% of social distress. These changes were statistically significant (p<\/em> <.001).\n

<\/div><\/div>[vc_single_image image=”1148″ img_size=”full”]

<\/div>
. Patients\u2019 changes in quality of life 3 months after services<\/h6><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Significant Improvements on Caregiving Stress and Emotions in Family Caregivers<\/h4><\/div>
\n

A total of 343 family caregivers completed the assessments at service intake and 3 months after services (figure 2). Assessed caregivers reported 23.5% reduction in caregiver strain, 35.2% reduction in depressive symptoms, and 21.3% reduction in anxiety. Caregivers reported 11.8% reduction in distress when facing patients\u2019 medical decision and 14.5% reduction in anxiety when patients\u2019 condition deteriorates. These changes were statistically significant (p<\/em> <.001). Moreover, among 352 bereaved family caregivers who were assessed two months after the death of patients, 95.7% reported low level of complicated grief.\u00a0 \u00a0<\/span><\/em>\n

<\/div><\/div>[vc_single_image image=”1151″ img_size=”full”]

<\/div>
Carers\u2019 changes in quality of life 3 months after services.<\/h6><\/div><\/div>
<\/div>

Reduced Unnecessary Medical Service Utilisation<\/h4><\/div>
\n

Regarding service impact on medical service utilisation in the last 6 months of life, retrievable data from 323 deceased patients suggested that the programme patients had 14.35 fewer hospital beddays, 0.69 fewer A&E attendances, and 0.30 fewer ICU beddays than EoL patients in general (figure 3). This result supports the effectiveness of the community-based EoLC programmes in helping patients to avoid unnecessary hospitalisation and stay home longer.\n

 \n

<\/div><\/div>[vc_single_image image=”1154″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text el_class=”txt fs18″]\n

Projecting this finding to 1 410 patients served by the four NGOs, the programmes would have helped spared 20 234 hospital bed days, 423 ICU beddays, and 973 A&E attendances to other needy patients. Taking the cost of these medical service into consideration, the programmes have also helped save 134 million medical costs\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”9147″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text el_class=”txt fs18 mt-4″]\n

Social return on Investment (SROI) analysis was further conducted on 3 ICESTs1<\/sup> over the 3 years. Findings suggested that $1 HK invested in ICEST could generate $3.58 HK of social values in return, suggesting that the ICEST was cost-effective\n

[\/vc_column_text][vc_single_image image=”9141″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text el_class=”txt fs18″]\n

Input <\/span>HK$32.3M\n

Output <\/span>(Patients + Carers + Volunteer Outcomes: $13.25M) + (Healthcare Service Utilisation Reduction: HK$102.1M) = Sum: HK$115.4M\n

 \n

[\/vc_column_text]

<\/div>

High Service Satisfaction<\/h4><\/div>
\n

Majority of the surveyed patients and family caregivers reported highly satisfied experience with the services. Among 120 surveyed patients and 249 family caregivers, 93.8% and 96.0% respectively express high level of overall satisfaction towards the services (7\/10 or higher). Moreover, 91.1% of surveyed patients reported that their preferences on the care plan have been respected by the service team; while 90.2% of surveyed caregivers reported that the service team enabled them to effectively take care of patients\u2019 daily life at home environment (7\/10 or higher).\n

<\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row bwd_tbc4vd_show_weekday=”” el_class=”boxshadow mb-5 wow fadeInUp animated”][vc_column]

<\/div>

Learnings in phase I and way forward in phase II<\/h3><\/div>
\n

Compared to Phase I, The programmes not only effectively improved the quality of life of patients and their caregivers from physical, mental, social and spiritual aspects, but unnecessary medical service utilisation among patients, allowing them to be taken care at home. More importantly, the programmes also resulted in significant savings in medical Furthermore, the programmes provide a satisfying experience for the majority of patients and caregivers, which patients found to be respectful to their care decision while effectively supported caregivers take care patients at home.\n

Based on the findings from these 6 years, effective service components were extracted to develop a unified service model \u2013 the Integrated Community End-of-Life Care Support Teams, and to improve the services according to the needs of patients and caregivers.\n

<\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column]

\n \n
<\/a><\/a><\/a><\/a>